The Court of Appeal`s findings included remarks that “the Constitution simply does not require the police to play with their lives in the face of a serious threat of harm” and that a “reviewing court cannot apply `the 20/20 retrospective vision` and must take into account the fact that police officers are often forced to render judgments in fractions of a second – in tense circumstances, uncertain and developing rapidly. (Graham vs. Connor). In retrospect, is it ever reasonable to assess the use of force? If so, when? If not, why? Only for law enforcement officers? Only for citizens? We often use this expression, in retrospect it`s 20/20 when we talk about things we regret or things that were not the best decision, but we didn`t realize it at the time; We don`t understand until later. Then, when we get to the end of the year, you won`t regret it. You won`t think, “Ah, I wish I had spent more time on my English, but in hindsight, it`s 20/20.” A “Snellen diagram” is a visual horoscope that measures a person`s visual acuity. A person with 20/20 vision has normal sharpness, which means that if they stood at a distance of 20 feet from the vision board, they would be able to see each row of letters clearly. So what if the person has 20/40 vision instead? Well, now the sharpness of the person is worse, so the letters they see clearly at a distance of 20 feet, someone with normal sharpness can see the same letters with equal clarity at a distance of 40 feet. The retrospective term is 20/20 means looking back on a situation or event and having a clearer understanding of it and how things could have been done better. In hindsight, the expression is that 20/20 emphasizes the clarity that people have about their past decisions, as opposed to uncertainty before making the decision. Many people use the expression that looking back is 20-20, that is, the ability to better understand a situation after it has occurred. Let`s get into a few financial situations that may require a second look. Let`s say that in the past, your sister was with a guy who wasn`t very nice to her. He was manipulative and rude, and he didn`t treat her well, but she was in love with him at the time.
Later, they broke up – which meant the relationship ended – and today your sister is telling you, “I can`t believe I dated such a terrible guy!” “Twenty-twenty retrospectives.” dictionary Merriam-Webster.com, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/twenty-twenty%20hindsight. Retrieved 20 September 2022. The word retrospective refers to looking back or thinking about things in the past, and 20/20 refers to perfect vision. So when we look back in situations of the past, we clearly see things that were not clear to us at the time. And you might say, “Well, in hindsight, it`s still 20/20.” Hello students! It`s Shayna from EspressoEnglish.net, and today I`m going to explain an interesting expression, and it`s “retrospective is 20/20” or sometimes people say “retrospective is always 20/20”. As the saying goes, in retrospect, it`s 20/20, but what do even those numbers mean? Basically, it refers to a person`s normal visual acuity, sharpness or clarity of vision. Let me elaborate on this by giving an example: Grace: Yes, I also regret very big regrets. I should never have married my first husband. I knew we had problems, but I thought we could solve them. In the end, the problems were simply too big to overcome. After a traffic stop in 1995, Constable J.
Leavitt arrested the driver, Archie Elliot, for driving under the influence of alcohol. Elliot was then handcuffed, searched and placed in the front seat of Constable Leavitt`s patrol car, strapped, with the door closed and the window closed. Finally, Constable Leavitt and his deputy constable observed Elliot with their finger on the trigger of a small handgun. Constable Leavitt ordered Elliot to drop the gun, and after Elliot failed to comply, the officers shot Elliot. A forensic analysis confirmed that the handgun came from Elliot`s shorts. A grand jury refused to charge the officials, and an internal investigation exonerated the officials of any wrongdoing. Okay, how old is this sentence? The “Snellen map” was published in 1862, so it was probably created some time later that year. The first use of the term in printed form (which I could find) came from a newspaper called The Van Nuys News, February 1949. There is a part that reads as follows: Home » Dictionary of Sentences and Idioms » What does Hindsight 20 20 mean? Some use of force by law enforcement agencies is criticized retrospectively by offering alternatives that the law enforcement officer or officers concerned should have used, or conditions that the officer should have recognized or considered. Criticism may include opinions that indicate that the subject concerned does not pose a significant threat to the officer(s), although in some cases the subject has had the ability to inflict serious bodily harm or death. Opinions may not be supported by documentation showing that the critic had relevant and significant field experience or an understanding of human performance factors.
Frank: Well, obviously, I know that now. The exam is 20/20. The original court was also concerned that the number of shots fired by law enforcement was too high. The Court of Appeal stated that “the number of shots fired alone cannot determine whether the force used was appropriate. The fact that several shots were fired does not indicate that the officers fired without thinking, but it does suggest that they wanted to ensure the elimination of a deadly threat. The court also rejected the claim that Elliott`s poisoning had somehow made him less threatening, stating, “No citizen can reasonably expect to fire a gun at the police without risking tragic consequences. And no court can expect a person to remain passive in the face of an active threat to their life. However, officials do not have to be absolutely sure that the nature of the threat or the suspect`s intention to harm them is caused – the Constitution does not require certainty to precede the act of self-protection. Definition: Decisions that seemed difficult in the past now seem clear once the person knows what happened as a result of those decisions. In this example, two friends talk about things they would change in their past if they had the opportunity. This example shows two students using the idiom after making a bad decision.
Elliot v. Does Leavitt have anything to do with civil violence? Should he do that? Frank: I can`t believe I was caught cheating on this quiz.